![]() It seems to be made up of nothing but interconnecting nerves, and totally lacks any kind of mechanised microstructures. Learning itself is a mysterious process - how does the brain store information, and are we fundamentally changed as a person when we learning something new? Despite an abundance of clinical data, the human brain refuses to give up most of its secrets. ![]() `It is also natural and appealing to think that all people have the potential to learn effectively andĮasily if only instruction is tailored to their individual learning styles.` `It seems that the idea of finding out ``what type of person one is`` has some eternal and deep appeal.` ![]() The study, entitled Learning Styles: Concepts and Evidence, casts doubt over the idea that different learning styles even exist, proposing that humans have a tendency to categorise and simplify, a natural urge to put people into groups. It is not uncommon for theories to come about this way, growing out of earlier studies but whereas in the empirical sciences, especially mathematics and physics, this can lead to great discoveries, in the social sciences it can give credence dubious conjectures - neuromyth`s like we only use 10% of our brains. The study suggests that the learning categories themselves have simply come out of earlier theories, some going back to Carl Jung`s work of the 1960`s. The study points out that more than three decades of academic literature, along with hundreds of studies, have yielded no evidence to suggest matching the method of teaching to a child`s mode of learning facilitates their understanding. Louis have recently published a paper in the Journal of the Association for Psychological Science, that says there is little actual robust evidence to suggest matching the mode of teaching to people`s preferred style helps them to learn any better. Scientists from the universities of California and St. The actual science behind these different categories of learning has however been recently challenged. The belief that children fall into different learning categories has been around for many decades, but it wasn`t until the early 1990`s, when the New Zealander cognitive scientist Neil Fleming proposed the VAK/VARK model, that the different learning groups were properly codified. Kinaesthetic learners are thought to gain understanding through physical activities, or manipulating models. The prevalent opinion in the education sector is that 40% of us are visual learners - this goes for both adults and children, and that 30% of people are auditory learners, with the remaining 30% being kinaesthetic learners. If you are an auditory learner your learning will be facilitated through the spoken word. If you are a visual learner you will understand information with greater ease through the medium of pictures, including graphs, charts, maps and diagrams. People are commonly classified as being either visual or auditory learners.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |